“Why Don’t They Land On The White House Lawn?”

In my estimate there have been at least 40 thousand tapes of UFOs, including crafts, (twenty five thousands to Jaime Maussan’s alone) during the 17 years of the Mexican flap.

On Video Below:
Junior Astronaut in a Woody Alien Voice:
"Hey Sir, excuse me I think, a ahaa, there is a UFO flying over there behind you."
Senior Astronaut Chaney Voice:
"AAAk AAAk listen you wimp. Aaaak don't bother me with details do your job. Commie Liberal Punk"

Clip from David Sereda's DVD "Evidence For NASA UFOs"



By the sounds of the following statement by leading astronomers in Britain they need to get out more:

“Intelligent extra-terrestrials almost certainly exist on distant planets beyond our solar system, leading British astronomers told the government yesterday.
The scientists expect that the first evidence of primitive alien life, such as microbes and vegetation, will emerge within 10 years, with more substantial finds following future space missions.”
Linked from the Anomalist
http://www.anomalist.com/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/space/article/0,,2096473,00.html

The statement above to me is laughable, not hopeful.

There is a presence here and if the scientists want to see the evidence, they have only to go to Mexico. But spend some time there, don’t go there for one day and proclaim you have the answer: it’s ballooooons!

Truth is, you will never hear of National Geographic sending a team of experts down to Mexico for any expended period of time to film and study this phenomenon. The thousands of citizens, pilots, groups, TV journalists, airport personnel, police officers, town mayors and other officials, live news broadcasts --and even the Mexican drug border patrol officers who video taped these objects-- all these witnesses mean nothing to closed scientific minds and the media.

There is not a chance of any debunker explaining reasonably what is happening in Mexico…because it is overwhelming.

The Media is doing a wonderful job. Keep it up. Pretend it isn’t there, except when something astounding happens and the defenders of their "truth" can’t deny it.

What to do then? Let me see…I've got it, by God! Just follow the scenario: you throw something out, don’t worry, it will be swallowed. But don’t ever allude to the bigger picture.

On the other thousands of thousands of other UFO sighted and video taped.
In all the predictions and portrayals in the movies of ET contact, UFOs landing and making formal contact always happens in America. They would land at the UN or the White House and contact would begin. It does sound logical. If you want to make contact, you do it with the power elite, those in charge. That’s how we do it.

But it seems to me, if anything, the UFO entities have an affinity for the common folk like me. I don’t believe there is much proof that the ETs and the government are in cahoots. If you compare the validity and believability of John Lear’s testimony against, let’s say, a June Crain, whose honesty of character and story ring so true, June would win, hands down.

I have a clue for you. If you want to know when a story is disinformation, look for a ridiculous statement along with all the statements that ring true.

In John Lear’s case, he claims Venus --along with other planets-- is inhabited and what you see on the planet is not the surface. There is also Bob Lazar, who never said anything about aliens in the beginning of his disclosure accounts. That doesn’t have to mean John Lear lied, but those leaks given to him are the set ups for the UFO community…or maybe the tendency to embellish. I’m just wondering why Mr. Lear bought it. There are numerous examples of these leaks of disinformation designed to make a mockery of our field.

But ETs seem to do the same thing. In a previous post, “Applied Species Psychology” in what I theorize as staging, I’ve written that ETs make their presence palatable --and palatable only to the believers-- by performing a type of play, ridiculous displays with alien costumes right out of TV and other public media. This way the possibility of ETs ever being taken seriously becomes almost non-existent.

Also, if you can wrap yourself in metaphysical displays, even those who may have witnessed your hardware and believe something is there become confused as they investigate. A very smart strategy, indeed.

But not only do those witnesses become confused, they give up.

The most credible witnesses whose reports have stood the test of time lead me to believe we have in our possession the remnants of a crashed saucer.

Also, as testified to by June Crain --who was there, I believe, when it happened-- we have in our possession some bodies that were recovered.

Beyond that, for me it is guess work. I’m not even sure that what crashed and was recovered represented anything near the ETs’ best technology. Would you fly around a world of intelligent human predators with your best technology?

If formal contact is made in Mexico, what a joke that would be on America! Here we are, a country that used to be the shining example of tolerance and democracy, left out of the first contact with a species from another planet. It would serve us right.

Maybe after public contact, the aliens will pretend America’s scientists couldn’t possibly exist. They may have a good case.

Joseph Capp
UFO Media Matters.
Update on NASA Tape: I found out NASA is not carried on Cablevision. You can use streaming video on the Web. At this point, I am trying to find the proper Video Recorder that can rip the stream. The ones I've looked at are not good. I will let you know. I have already lost two days.

NASA Can’t See The Forest For The Trees

I don’t like others to tell me what to think. It seems there is a lot of that going around lately. These pictures are from the “Mars Anomaly Research”. I am really interested in what they imply. The more I look at Mars the more I think the NASA scientists are in denial or liars. How long are we going to believe the answers they throw out which just do not cover, or in any way, explain what we are seeing? Many feel we are constantly treated with compete contempt and disregard by this tax supported agency. But most of all, how stupid do they think we are? I don’t know for sure if this is life but it is not rocks or the dark soil underneath.
First we have the main Mars photo without magnification.

“The above first image evidence is not something that I would normally report on simply because I doubt that very many would be able to distinguish this from geological terrain. This type of evidence is common in the Mars distant obfuscated satellite imaging. I pass over reporting on evidence like this often because I suspect many would see this as just too inconclusive. Yet it is biological life and it is included in this report because it is present in this strip and it demonstrates yet another example of a different looking Mars forest life bio-diversity.”

Skipper on the second image 200 magnifications – Don’t believe your eyes, believe the great god NASA:

2nd Image Mars

3rd Image Earth:

Skipper:

“The above (2nd) .. image is a 200% zoom factor closer view of a section of the Mars vegetation forest evidence. I have not imaged the bands of algae growth evidence or other growth on either side of this band of tree evidence because the main thrust of this report is the conventional vegetation woody forest tree evidence. This view is just beginning to get a little too blurry but it is still informative as to being able to identify this as mostly conventional woody tree forest fragment evidence.”

Skipper:

"Now in the above..(third) image I want you to compare the Mars vegetation forest fragment evidence in the previous 2–4 images to this similar looking Earth based hardwood forest fragment evidence. This Earth evidence comes as a more oblique closer aerial view without obfuscation tactics and resolution problems present in it and so the view of detail making up the forest canopy upper surface is of course better than in the much greater distant and resolution compromised Mars satellite imaging lacking in such subtle detail.”

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2007/118/forest-biodiversity-9.htm

.
The end results is these cursory attempts to explain Anomalies images by NASA and the debunkers that have fueled and reinforced the contempt many people feel toward NASA and their lock step debunkers.
As long as we accept these stupid explanations we will get stupid explanations. I am an activist in the political arena. I find the same contempt by politician in treating the public. They seem to think all we need to be concerned with are lower taxes, lower gas prices, never mind accountability. I have always believed there are Americans who are not that selfish.
The same can be said for NASAs utter contempt for the public unless of course it has to do with support for their next project. If you think I’m crazy try and pay to get any compete Shuttle mission video, the videos we paid for; but please don’t hold your breath.

NASA We Are Not That Stupid

Joseph Capp
UFO Media Matters.