Friday, October 1, 2010

UFOs, God and Steven Hawkin

Steven Hawkin made a statement that “science no longer needs God to explain the Universe”. I say, any cosmologist who can make a statement like that with ninety six percent of the universe unexplained is a tad lacking in his humility.

Scientists seem to think that to know more than others somehow give’s them special insights into matters that may be even beyond them. Steven Hawkin's statement is a little misleading. He suggested that science had just arrived at this no God universe. Actually, they have been pushing a no God universe from the start of modern cosmology. You see, science had the whole thing rigged from the get go. Before the “Big Bang,” least we forget, was the “Steady State” universe, remember that? There was no need for a God in a universe with no beginning or end. What happened next within mainstream cosmology reflects the very arrogance that Hawkin displays. A lowly Jesuit mathematician, Monsignor Georges Henri Joseph, came to Einstein with a theory. The theory was that the universe had a beginning. The universe was expanding and if you followed it back you would find the moment of its inception. Einstein immediately rejected this theory. This was considered religion by the mainstreamed cosmologists, and I mean that literally. It is admitted now that many mainstreamed scientists rejected this theory out of hand because of the implication of creation and its possible link to religion. Eventually, Monsignor Georges Henri Joseph’s universe was proven to be right and the rest is history. For the following decades, science tried to find a way around the order in the laws to the universe without a God and, thanks to String Theory, they have it.

http://godzdogz.op.org/2010/04/celebrating-priesthood-monsignor.html

According to Quantum Mechanics everything is random; including our Universe. This was at odds with what cosmologists found. The four fundamental forces: the Weak Force, Strong force, Electromagnetic force and Gravity from the very beginning, were in perfect proportions for life to evolve. Science has proven that fluctuation to any of these forces would mean no life at all in the universe. The new hypothesis that scientists came up to explain this was that there were unlimited universes created by unlimited “Branes” in another dimension with their own time and random forces.

“M-theory

See also: Brane cosmology and String theory landscape

A multiverse of a somewhat different kind has been envisaged within the multi-dimensional extension of string theory known as M-theory, also known as Membrane Theory.[13] In M-theory our universe and others are created by collisions between p-branes in a space with 11 and 26 dimensions (the number of dimensions depends on the chirality of the observer);[14][15] each universe takes the form of a D-brane.[14][15] Objects in each universe are essentially confined to the D-brane of their universe, but may be able to interact with other universes via gravity, a force which is not restricted to D-branes.[16] This is unlike the universes in the "quantum multiverse", but both concepts can operate at the same time.”

In other words, we were just lucky in the role of the never ending universe of dices. With this theory, which can never really be proven, the scientists of today can rest easy in their godless universe. Did you ever notice how much scientists in their latest new theories throw around the term “infinite” to explain what they can’t explain such as “Branes” floating in infinite nothing, infinitely bumping into each other, causing infinite universes with their infinite times and infinite laws...” l guess you get the idea.

UFOs are treated with the same contempt as God by most mainstream scientists. The only difference is these scientists don’t have to spend a single day reading or researching UFOs to explain them. All they ever have to do is make a public proclamation. These uninformed stupid explanations are accepted by the public and they go to sleep. They are never really challenged by other scientists of stature, leaving only the professionals in the UFO community to challenge their lame explanations.

Believe me, why scientist think they are educating the public by making statement they can’t possibly know is true, is a mystery. Recently I read an article about Wang Sichao, a research fellow at the Purple Mountain Observatory. It seems China is starting the rev up their research on UFOs. One of the questions that was put to Professor Sichao by the author of the article below was his feelings on whether there has been enough investigation going on with regards to UFOs. He replies:

“Why, for 60 years, was there no progress in UFO studies? The reason is that a UFO only appears randomly and often disappears rapidly in a few minutes. By the time large professional telescopes are started up, it has already disappeared.”

http://bjreview.com.cn/quotes/txt/2010-09/28/content_301050.htm

I don’t know about China but there are places in the US where scientists could study UFOs. Throughout UFO history there has been and continues to be places where these objects are seen on a consistent basis. In Washington state, in Utah, and in Colorado, just to name a few. If there was a real effort to get people out of the closet on this subject I would bet there would be many more. If ETs are here they may have bases and facilities in the mountains and in very rural areas. There is absolutely no excuse for science to sit on the sidelines and let this phenomenon be.

UFOs are tangible they can be measured and proven to exist. If scientists claim it is the myth and its groups built around UFOS that stop their research, I say how about now? Today scientists do their research in spite of opinion or group myth. They even challenge God for God’s sake! There is something in the ego psyche of scientist that resents ETs if they are here. In “Contact” aliens wanted to speak to other scientist but the aliens that are described seem to want to communicate, if at all, with regular folks. In fact they seem to thumb what’s left of their noses, at scientists. I would like to make another point about cosmologist and their egos. These brilliant cosmologist can go to their gave defending a theory that is proven time and again wrong, Fred Holy is an example of that

I think it is time has come for everyone scientist, layman and skeptics to admit in all humility that there are mysteries still out there which have not been given their due, the mystic experiences, the paranormal including intelligence after death and Unknown flying craft in our atmosphere. These have not been explained and basically been rejected out of hand

The answer to these riddles may open a whole new door to what God is or is not and how we came to be.

Clip Is Through The Worm Hole : “Is There a Creator”

Joseph Capp
UFO Media Matters
Non-Commercial Blog



19 comments:

  1. I think Dr. Hawking is very clever about generating press. Remember the hubbub a few months back over his "alien invasion" concerns? He knows how to plug a project and he does provoke conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Frank,
    You seem to be right. It seems Dr. Hawkin God bless him, is able to produce new theories but loves the limelight.

    Thanks
    Joe
    UFOMM

    ReplyDelete
  3. God bless him indeed and the limelight could use a few more Dr. Hawkings, Neil Tysons and Michio Kakus. We don't have to agree with everything they say or like their influence (I think Kaku has, unintentionally, hurt Ufology) but they raise the level of public discourse and that is always to be applauded.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What if the universe is indeed infinite and as recent evidence suggests the forces are NOT in perfect equilibrium in most of the universe. We just happen to be in (one of) the parts of the infinite universe where they are. Chance could still account for our existence. Since we ourselves happen to be the google to one shot we have no perspective. We say "This is so unlikely to have happened!" and we are right. It is only because we ourselves ARE the rarity that we are in a position to ever consider the situation. Everywhere else is barren. The truly sad thing is that we are taking such poor care of what may very well be the only planet in the entire universe with life on it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What if indeed there is no God? That the universe is totally random but truly infinite. We are in no position to have any perspective. We could very well be the only planet in all of the possible universes where everything HAS managed to come together to create life. Being the gazillion to one shot doesn't mean you don't exist, it just means that you sort of expect others to be in the same boat. Maybe we are the singular example in the totality of existence. God or not I think the sad thing is that we are taking such poor care of what very well might be the only planet in all of existence which has been fortunate enough to have life.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I recently read Hawking's Universe in a Nutshell. Short and full of unprovable theories. I could do that. Except I already have a religion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear Rob,
    I know that many feel to believe in God is believing in religion but for me God is the term used for a belief in a creator of the Universe a central intelligence beyond time and dimension that created evolution and all of its complexities but this creator added something else...purpose... Oh, it's well disguised, but it is there. The creator theory has defied religion and science to explain the creator's purpose yet in many testable ways, through all of this Gods existence is still affirmed.
    Thanks
    Joe
    UFOMM

    ReplyDelete
  8. Egotistical technocrats are a dime a dozen like moths to a limelight, they see the universe in their fingernails while Rome burns. His opinion belongs on velveteen on s folding table in some tourist trap. He is an smartass among smartasses, worthy of a trophy meant for the king of the ants.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bruce where is you spirituality side? You must know that God the Paranormal and UFOs are a threat to their very status on this planet. They couldn't be wrong about any one of these subjects.
    Funny though despite having the last say on these subjects they are still experienced by credible skeptics at there in the public. People who become believes almost immediately. Some of them are scientist yet somehow now lost in the mainstream scientist's quagmire of denial and they become, almost immediately, no longer real scientist. This attitude hurts real people and is more than just an exercise in different beliefs. Although I respect Dr. Hawlking but I think the conclusive evidence is far from in yet on whether science has figured out the universe without a God.
    Thanks Bruce
    Joe

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bruce Duesing
    Science without religion is like religion without science. The universe is too big for small minds and absolute markers. I look at at a mountain and see there are realities bigger than my small mind. Hawking, in the long run, does himself more disservice and damage as well as that of young folks every time he longs to be oohed and awed by syncopates who cannot think for themselves, or at least, that seems to be his motive..I could care less what he thinks. He has become a Walmart of the Mind..cheap goods and marketing gimmicks. If this is brilliance, give me ignorance

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am sorry Bruce had to had paste your comment hit wrong button.

    I often wondered what Gods the ETs have. What do they think of a species that thinks they are the central creation of God. I believe to this day that religion was created through the experience of the paranormal. No matter what the scientist say they can't not stop people from experiencing the paranormal. For a while it became silly nut stuff but now it is starting to look as if it is beginning to be taking seriously.
    So many "non-scientits" investigators. doing what scientist are suppose to be doing and doing and getting separate wonderful results.
    Thanks Bruce
    Hope everything is good with you.
    joe

    ReplyDelete
  12. I was just passing by--glad I did. This is a great blog and the comments were meaningful and insightful. I recently heard Hawking on Lary King promoting his new book The Grand Design. His argument seemed to boil down to the universe just popping into existence out of nowhere because of quantum physics. I really don't understand how this explained anything. I just don't understand how something comes from nothinginess. I don't understand the expansion of the big bang, either. What fuels the big bang in the first place and how is it possible that a speck transforms itself into the universe? Where is all the matter and energy coming from? So let me ask any of you, how all this plays out with dark matter and dark energy, and the big crunch if there is one. Anyway, thanks for letting me listen in!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cal:

    As far as we know (which is very little; admittedly), gravity, magnetism, strong, and weak force all work in the same manner here as anywhere else in the Universe. In fact what data we've gathered from distant light sources has thus far confirmed this.

    I see no reason to doubt these basic laws of our universe.

    As for Mr Hawking; he is absolutely right. We should be very cautious when dealing with the search for life; and should seriously delve into it's existance here.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well Joe, this is Al in Denver as you know that I got the SuperVision starlight device and what I found was just insane. I have posted some short clips of the very fast turning craft ?? on my youtube channel, you are welcome to post and spread the information about this, it's hard for me to accept this as I was in the USAF for many years, and only rumors abounded by pilots and everybody kept tight lips on this subject. I work in a pure science and the issue of this type of craft is just hard to comprehend outright. I am going to spend some time put together a very fast SKY tracking system that will follow them across the sky. I will have to get more gear and optical system with hires cameras and different wave length band cameras. Well on the other I just went and bought the hottest UFO book in Barns and Noble by Leslie Kean, I think it will dove tail to my past air force job. P.S. I have written the script for the youtube videos at about 2:30 am and I think it's a little out of character for me, please tell me it's too angry.. Al

    links to my videos tow of them ..
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHIuylwdLOg

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHK0yC7KU14&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kftuAXeyE1U&NR=1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzGcZl3OPuY&feature=related

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dear Cal,
    I recently read an article on Physorg my favorite science site about scientist claiming they have shown that the "constants" are not so constant. They are throwing a lot of stuff out there and I think it is because of they are threatened by the power of what they don't know about the unknown universe all 96 percent of it.
    As long as people have personal paranormal and UFO experiences they will believe. Unless scientist address these phenomenon objectively there vision of reality will always be vehemently denied.
    In fact if you think about it science inaction has fueled the fundamentalist. They are quick to point out these experiences as proof of a devil and demons staking claim it's explanation.
    In Steven Hawkin's world none of this exist. In a way he also is a fundamentalist.
    Thanks
    Joe
    UFOMM

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dear Al,
    Thank you for sharing those videos. They were very fast for satellites. We go out with our scopes and see satellites all the time they don't shoot across the sky like that. Meteors would not take that long to burn and if they did they would have a tail. Some will say they are birds. I would like to know what was the height of the clouds on the night you shot the object make a circle the object was above these clouds. I have a friend in Oregon who is going out this weekend with his own super night vision. So this is catching on. Great set up by the way. Do you video while on a tripod? I don't quite understand the reference to what you wrote maybe you could clear that up.
    thanks
    Joe
    UFOMM

    ReplyDelete
  17. There are universes with god. There are universes without god. There are universes in which god takes an interest. There are those to which (s)he is indifferent. And there are infinite universes in between. Which kind is this?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Dear John,

    "There's the rub".

    Joe
    UFOMM

    ReplyDelete
  19. One overlooked aspect of UFO's and Michio Kaku's affirmation that they are real, is that it strengthens the intelligent design argument. The directed panspermia argument explains the possibility of alien seeding life in the past. This is a strong argument against undirected naturalism (Darwinism), but is seldom giving as a strong case for intelligent design to become an accepted theory in the classrooms.
    If they are visiting now, they could have visited in the past and seeded life on earth. This original life causation would explain the mystery of high irreducible complexity at the cellular level, and is a very strong argument supporting intelligent design hypothesis.

    ReplyDelete