Monday, November 30, 2009

Tips before and after you see a UFO

UFOMM: Will be sailing into the Bermuda Triangle On a cruise till 12/19/09 will be back then Have a great Christmas and Chanuka.

There is one thing I know from my many years of reading on this subject, and that is, what a UFO witness should, and shouldn't do during, and after, a UFO sighting. Of course, most people don't plan on seeing a UFO, or if they do, never report it. But, for those who may

One important rule to remember is when you see a UFO alone it usually means nothing but a footnote in UFO history. The exception to this rule is when professionals, police, pilots, etc. experience unknown objects and report them. These trained professionals obviously carry more weight. Unfortunately, for the rest of us mortals, reporting a sighting may not get any real attention and may be dismissed as prosaic even though you're certain it was not. That can be rather frustrating if you really want to know what you saw.

Below I have some pointers to help you become more of a master of your sighting rather than having your sighting master you. I don't say that lightly either. There are many instances when people experience a UFO and their credibility and honesty were instantly challenged. For what you may ask? The answer is simple: because they saw a UFO. I know, thank God, there are people out there, individuals, who will stand up and report what they saw regardless of what other people may say or think.

  1. If you see a UFO keep your head.
    The problem with seeing a UFO is the event becomes so startling that the witnesses are not using their heads. They forget they have the means, in many instances, to prove the event really happened. I met a scientist on a cruise once. He had one previous experience. He told me once he witnessed "shiny spheres" shooting along the highway in front of his car. His wife and family didn't believe him. We became friends and he started to delve into UFOs. Now he is a strong supporter of the realities of UFOs. About 6 months after we met the whole family was in their car when they had a daylight sighting. His wife and family no longer doubts him. He called me on the phone right after the sighting. The important point here is they had a video camera and photo camera in the car but the shock of what he saw gave him total "UFO amnesia" and he forgot he had them. Photos and video are important, but nothing beats independent witnesses with their own evidence. So, if you see people watching the same object it would be very smart if you could exchange phone numbers with them, or at least get their numbers.

  2. Write down all the information you can about the sighting before you report it.
    Jot down all the specifics: the more detailed the better. Make sketches of the object: color, size, shape, and movement. Include also an estimate of the degree position the object in relation to the horizon and also compass directions. If it's at night take notes of any stars or planets near your sighting. Many phones now have compasses and make it possible to go on the web. You can use them to find not only the positions of the stars and planets, but also satellites, their times and positions.

  3. Never lie or embellish your UFO sighting.
    You never know how important your sighting will become and there are people out there in media just waiting to discredit you. If you think they are stupid you'd be making a big mistake. One of the great witnesses to Roswell known as the "Mortician" lied about names of the nurse and his story changed over the course of time. Although his original statement had been repeated many times in the town years before any publicity, his inconsistencies were fodder for the skeptics. It is perfectly understandable if a person wishes to hold back certain aspects of the sighting till that person is comfortable with his/her investigator. For years ranchers never spoke of seeing landed disk and entities, even though now they claim they had witnessed them during times of mutilations. They claimed they withheld that information because if they had said anything people would have thought they were crazy. Hey, you know something… they're right. My strong suggestion, in that case, is to be upfront with the investigator right away. State your position as plainly as possible; that you are not comfortable with sharing everything at this time. This will save you a great deal of grief if you decide to reveal it later on. I say this as a student of UFO history; it is the best way to go.


  4. Report your sighting.
    MUFON is the best place to report your sighting. They have some great field investigators and they have a much better system of tracking the progress of a case. As far as MUFON getting back to you quickly, the more MUFON investigators in your area the better chance you have of your case being looked at quickly. The other place to report a sighting is the National UFO Reporting Center. Although NUFORC will take your sighting they don't investigate. They will, however, notify MUFON if a report looks very interesting and or is part and parcel to other UFO sightings in the same area (flap).


  5. There is a big secret in UFO history.
    In the beginning of UFO investigations if witnesses claimed multiple sightings at different times, that person would have been considered too far out to be of interest. That has changed tremendously. Many of our researchers now know people do indeed have multiple sightings. The point here is you may want to go back to the same area the next night (most of these types of recurrences happen at night) or, in those rare instances, the next day. If the sighting was at night, go a little earlier and take pictures of the area in the daytime concentrating on any objects in the area: trees, hills, and manmade structures. If you can measure the distances to these markers of course that would help. Your trip will not be wasted even if you don't see anything.

  6. Reporting a UFO publically can be dangerous to your career.
    I am not self righteous enough to tell people to endanger their career over a UFO sighting. If you're involved with government contracts, or any place where "they" can hurt you or damage your career, don't give your name. I suggest you report the sighting anonymously with MUFON. MUFON will keep your anonymity. Anonymity is one of the pillars of MUFON. Simply put they can be trusted and in their training (which I took) they stress the importance of maintaining anonymity when requested. Why even report it if it's anonymous? Your report may bring other people out of the "UFO closet." This may mean they also report their sighting confirming what you saw. Believe me you will feel better if other people witnessed what you witnessed.


  1. Look out for the media.
    The reality of the world is the media will try to trivialize your report. If your experience ends up bringing attention and you are interviewed, they usually bring debunkers on after you are interviewed. Try and counter in your initial interview the objections to your case these skeptics may make. Example: if Jupiter or another planet was close to the same area of the sky as your object mention that, because, you can be sure, if you don't, they will… In other words ,cover all your bases. If you have any professional standing that could lend credibility to your sighting, mention it ( if you can). If you are allowed to counter the skeptic, challenge any ridiculous statement they may have made, (there usually some) and keep your head; USUALLY, DEBUNKERS KNOW LESS THAN YOU ABOUT UFOS. Don't be intimidated, they are bluffing.


  2. Getting money for your experience has it's headaches.
    Suppose you have that rare UFO experience so profound, and well substantiated, it receives a thorough investigation with even the possibility of a book deal. What should you do? Obviously in this illustration the investigation went well for the person, in other words concrete independent evidence that something did happen. Now, it gets complicated. People may push you and pull you all kinds of ways. I suggest you remember why you reported your experience(s) in the first place…it was probably a selfless act. Stay true to that integrity above all else, in your testimony, and even with the lure of more money. If you do this you will certainly be in good standing with the UFO community. You can bank on that.

  3. What happens if you are asked to speak at some UFO conferences?

    That of course is up to each and every person to decide. I can tell you what I have observed at conferences. The support for well documented cases is phenomenal. Each one of them is perceived by most of the UFO community, as a break in the wall against humanity's ignorance. There are some people in our community that seem to have their own agenda, whatever the hell it is. These people will question any human weakness you have. This type of unfairness doesn't go unchallenged with most of the UFO community; they will support you in every way.


    Is it worth it? The strongest evidence we have points to Extra Terrestrial Vehicles. They have continually monitored the Second World War, our nuclear buildup and our trips in space. They have even shot down missiles. At this very moment they are being witnessed and recorded all over the world. We've had an American hero who walked on the moon stating emphatically and publically that ETs are here. When UFO craft and its occupants turn out to be a public reality your UFO experience will take on a significance you could hardly have dreamed of.


    Above all else, people of the world, report UFOs because knowledge is power.


    KEEP WATCHING THE SKIES



    Joseph Capp
    UFO Media Matters
    Non-Commercial Blog

    Note: Nasa has proven those rocks from Mars do after all contain life.
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/space/article6934078.ece

    The Mortician From Roswell

    object width="425" height="344">





  4. Robert Durant defending the Roswell witnesses: Roswell Yes!


Friday, November 20, 2009

The UFO Dr. Who Cried Wolf Wolf!

People in the UFO community for the most part want disclosure. Dr. Salla happily gives it to them…every few months.

I am sure the doctor cares about the people in the UFO community but these same people are disappointed when his insider dope doesn't pan out. Not one in UFO research or any UFO "spokesperson", in our community wants to admit there sources stink. Michael Salla, PhD is a member of the Exopoltics Movement. They are part and parcel to a movement that thinks if you accuse the government, through the media, of hideous things, with no hard evidence, they will be embarrassed enough to give you all you want .

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-2383-Honolulu-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2009m10d21-Official-disclosure-of-extraterrestrial-life-is-imminent

Dr. Salla touted out a few months ago information on a UFO UN meeting the only problem was it never happened. Let me ask the reader if they think something this big would be leaked to Dr. Salla or his insiders? I ask ,in all humility, when this falls through Dr. Salla, will you finally stop listening to these inside people? There seems to be a great deal of crying wolf around some blogs these days I guess it's more about getting hits than helping the truth get out . I was born in the old school of thinking integrity matters and shouldn't be squandered for any fleeting nonsense.

The year 2008 was a year of many pronouncements about contact. Rumors about ET landing were rapid. I was caught up in it myself. I don't put anyone down for getting caught up in this. When a person spends part of their life knowing something important is true, you'd want it to be proven right. What I saw was a flying saucer. I know that for myself but it doesn't mean a "hill of beans in this world". You can move a group through truth or through lies. Truth always last longer because truth is consistent. Dr. Salla, I expect is a good person, but I think he should be more careful on these announcements. Responsible reporting and reminding the reader that this is probably not going to happened would have been the right way to go. Yes we would like to have it out in the open …no we don't want to look like idiots, again.

My Prediction:

Obama will not do this and Dr. Salla sources will make some excuse why it didn't happen. Do I have a crystal ball? No just common sense.


I will be visiting Dr. Salla's blog when this doesn't happen to see what he says. Maybe others, who don't like his way of doing things, should do the same.




Joseph Capp
UFO Media Matters
Non-Commercial Blog

Monday, November 16, 2009

UFO Media Matters: MUFON VS The Aliens - Who Won?

Heads Up New Yorkers: Intruders Foundation in Manhattan is having speakers again. December 5th Col Charles Halt retired will be speaking o the n Rendlesham UFO incident. Here is the link for pertinent information.
http://www.intrudersfoundation.org/if_events.html

A few years ago MUFON tried to catch ETs abducting humans. They selected a group of documented alien abductees and they began putting specially designed sensing units in each abductees’ home. MUFON had the abductee fill out forms each day on their recollection of the night before i.e., whether they thought something happened or not. The idea was simple and smart. You collate the data from the “tamper proof” sensors with the days that the abductee felt something happened. If the sensor picked up anomalies you would have independent verification something strange happened that same night. MUFON was smart; they expanded this to a good group of candidates which in the end could collaborate evidence from several units showing the same thing. This would be powerful evidence something was happening and it wasn’t not “night terrors.”

These are two photos of these sensor prototypes which were suppose to be disguised as normal everyday fixtures. The one on the right is their final modal.








Now I know many of you out there will say, “you can’t fool the ETs; they are too advanced”. I think the history of human – alien contact is full of ETs making mistakes, whether through arrogance, or just plain being imperfect. Bud Hopkins has been reporting for years how these entities make mistakes. When you think of public media and scientific reaction to ETs abduction, it is no wonder they treat us sometimes without a thought. I think, they think, we are just plain stupid. Maybe they‘re right.

So with this belief system in tow, MUFON went on trying for years to get the “Abduction Monitoring Project” up and running. Money, designing gear, and time were working against them but through the work of the grunts, it finally happened. They received the money and began the project. First, they had to change the name; why, you ask? Well they wanted independent outside verification and the word “abduction” turned these sources off, so it ended up being named the “Ambient Monitoring Project”. They also had to find the right abductees, which had to be solidly documented abduction cases. In the end they had sensors in place (Picture Below) and eventually gathered all the information they needed over several months. . These abductees’ names and such have been kept under wrap for obvious reasons. There is one problem I have with the selection process. The researcher whose cases these abduction candidates were selected from is also under wrap and he should be out there. Whoever made the selection process needs to be questioned about the process and the documentation around these candidates. As far as I know he/she has not gone public.
THE AMBIENT MONITORING PROJECT: MUFON Journal July 2008 #483.

So where is MUFON now with this data? “Nowhere, Man.” You see the big hang-up was getting an independent expert to work on this data with the money they had. They just couldn’t afford it. It seems this data is still sitting there gathering dust.

So my question is why not have someone they can afford do it? Ok, the best scenario is completely independent evaluation, but absence of that, any collating of the evidence is better than none. If these sensors have a chance in hell of monitoring anomalies in abduction cases than why not reveal the statistics for the public to view and analyze, if that be the case.. I don’t see why they can’t do both. I am sure there are volunteers in MUFON who could interpret this data. Why not use them? Is proving how great you are to scientists, who don’t even look at the evidence, more important than knowing what happened? In the future when MUFON has the money, they can have additional sources look the data over. The data doesn’t change.

I think MUFON’s first duty is to the witnesses and experiencers. If you believe some people are being abducted then why not release the data one way or the other? James Carrion recently leaked a document against MUFON’s own training manual suggestions, to debunk Stan Romanek. It seems MUFON, like Stan Romanek is sitting on it’s own unreleased documentation.

Right this minute MUFON has all of this data just sitting there at MUFON with no word of what happened or where they are with it. This project was designed to reveal the truth behind abductions. The hard work and determination of those who were part of this investigation needs to be rewarded with a conclusion. There might be all kinds of things happening with this project but you wouldn’t know it by the MUFON Journal, which first reported it. The Journal, at times, puts things out there without follow-ups and many times that leaves me wondering; What Happened?

So I ask with all due respect MUFON: What Happened To The Ambient Monitoring Project?

DVD Clip Dr. John Mack:



Joseph Capp
UFO Media Matters
Non-Commercial Blog